Magyar Zene Music Quarterly

 

 

 

 

Magyar Zene

Hungarian Language Music Quarterly
 

 

Vol. 49 , No. 3 - August 2011

 

 

Contents

 

Articles

 

CARL DAHLHAUS  
Liszt, Schönberg és a nagyforma
A „többtételesség az egytételességben” elve
249
[“Liszt, Schönberg und die große Form. Das Prinzip der Mehrsätzigkeit in der Einsätzigkeit” in Hungarian translation]  
DETLEF ALTENBURG  
Liszt Ferenc és a klasszika öröksége 262
Franz Liszt and the Legacy of the Classical Era (Abstract) 285
ALEXANDER REHDING  
Liszt és a Trisztán- akkord keresése 290
Liszt and the Search for the Tristan Chord (Abstract) 311
ANNA HARWELL CELENZA  
A halál transzfigurációja: Liszt Ferenc Haláltáncának forrásai és kialakulása 314
Death Transfigured: The Origins and Evolution of Franz Liszt’s Totentanz (Abstract) 338
ANNA DALOS  
A „Harmincasok” és az új zenei fordulat (1957–1967) 339
The Generation of Composers Born in the 30s and the Turn to New Music (1957–1967) (Abstract) 352

Work in Progress

 

ANNA SCHOLZ  
Artikuláció J. S. Bach hat csellószvitjében, 1. rész
A források és a kritikai kiadások problematikája
353
Articulation in Bach’s Six Suites for Solo Cello, Part 1
Problems of the Sources and the Critical Editions (Abstract)
365

Review

 

KLÁRA HAMBURGER  
Liszt levelei Carolyne Sayn-Wittgenstein hercegné lányához – végre eredeti nyelven 366
[Lettres de Franz Liszt à la princesse Marie de Hohenlohe- Schillingsfürst née de Sayn-Wittgestein. Présentées et annotées par Pauline Pocknell, Malou Haine et Nicolas Dufetel]  
   

The whole issue (pdf)

 

 



 

ABSTRACTS

 

 

DETLEF ALTENBURG

Franz Liszt and the Legacy of the Classical Era

 

During his lifetime, Franz Liszt, whose symphonic poems established a new genre for symphonic literature and prepared the way for Richard Wagner’s music drama, was regarded by his comtemporaries as an innovator who had broken with the tradition of Viennese classicism. Without any doubt Liszt was one of the most important innovators of 19th century music. But at the same time his innovations were deeply rooted in the tradition. During his Weimar years as Court Conductor Extraordinary (1848-1861) his activities reveal the nature of the enormous challenge facing Liszt the composer, namely, that of laying claim to the Classical legacies of both Weimar and Vienna.
Liszt’s claim to the legacy of Weimar classicism is articulated in very different levels of his compositional activity and aesthetic theory. It is among others reflected in his concept, transferred from piano music to the large representative genres, of regenerating music through its synthesis with literature into a poeticmusical art, the regeneration of music from the spirit of poetry. On the other hand, for Liszt, Beethoven’s legacy rested not in classicistic imitation but in continuing development and innovation. In abstracting the formal categories of the overture and symphony – at the very time when the symphonic genre was in danger of stagnating in imitative classicism and epigonism – he opened the way for a new era of symphonic style. Particularly for the national schools of symphonic music, the concept of the symphonic poem became an immeasurably important factor of national cultural identity. This is also the background for Brendel’s New German School designation. With Liszt, the criterion of increasing development of the spiritual in music defines the innovative component that was essential to his historical- philosophical argumentation declaring the „progressive musical party” the „New German School”. Only by invoking the universal spirit of Weimar classicism and Beethoven’s inheritance it was possible to declare the Frenchman Hector Berlioz and the Hungarian- born Franz Liszt, together with the exiled German Richard Wagner, representatives of a „German school”.

 

Detlef Altenburg, Professor of Musicology and Head of the Department of Musicology at The Liszt School of Music Weimar and the Friedrich Schiller University Jena, has published extensively on Liszt, Wagner and the New German School. His other research topics include Music History 1500-1800, especially Trumpet music, Theatre music and Performance practice. He is the editor of the Weimarer Liszt Studien and the complete edition of Liszt’s writings (Liszt: Sämtliche Schriften). He just published the catalogue of the Weimar Liszt exhibition Franz Liszt – Ein Europäer in Weimar (Cologne 2011). From 1990-1998 he was President, and since 1999 has been Vicepresident of the German Liszt Society. From 2001-2009 he was President of the German Society of Musicology, and from 2003- 2009 he was a member of the Board (Präsidium) of the German Music Council. Since 2009 he has been President of the International Liszt Association. He is a member of several academies (Akademie Gemeinnütziger Wissenschaften zu Erfurt, Sächsische Akademie der Wissenschaften Leipzig and the Academia Europaea).

Back to top »

 

 

ALEXANDER REHDING

Liszt and the Search for the Tristan Chord

 

The Tristan chord has long been understood as an emblem of musical modernity; the hunt for Tristan references has long been a favorite pastime among musicologists and analysts. The case of Liszt’s song “Ich möchte hingehn” (on a text by Georg Herwegh) shows what is at stake in this search: Liszt’s song contains a prominent Tristan reference, and its composition appears to predate Wagner’s music drama. Should therefore Liszt, and not Wagner, count as the genuine musical innovator? I argue that the question of “who came first?” is ultimately not very enlightening, and develop a wide hermeneutic context in which the Tristan passage may unfold its meaning.

 

Alexander Rehding is Fanny Peabody Professor at Harvard University and chair of the Music Department. From 2006 to 2010 he was editor of Acta Musicologica (with Philippe Vendrix). His research interests span music history and music theory from Ancient Greece to the contemporary period, with a focus on the nineteenth century. His publications include Music Theory and Natural Order from the Renaissance to the Early Twentieth Century (2001, ed. with Suzannah Clark), Hugo Riemann and the Birth of Modern Musical Thought (2003), Music and Monumentality: Commemoration and Wonderment in Nineteenth- Century German Music (2009), and The Oxford Handbook of Neo- Riemannian Music Theories (2011, ed. with Edward Gollin).

Back to top »

 

 

ANNA HARWELL CELENZA

Death Transfigured: The Origins and Evolution of Franz Liszt’s Totentanz

 

Liszt looked to Holbein’s Totentanz woodcut series and Orcagna’s Trionfo della morte fresco as inspiration for his programmatic piano concerto Totentanz. This article presents a chronological overview of various first- hand accounts of Liszt’s creative process that reveals how a composite of the two artworks, and their reception in the 19th century, was reflected by Liszt in the structure and extramusical content of his composition.

 

Anna Harwell Celenza is the Thomas E. Caestecker Professor of Music at Georgetown University. She is the author of several scholarly books – the most recent being Hans Christian Andersen and Music: The Nightingale Revealed (2005). Her work has also appeared in The Hopkins Review, Journal of the American Liszt Society, Music and Politics, Musical Quarterly, Nineteenth- Century Music, Notes, The Cambridge Companion to Liszt (2005), and Franz Liszt and His World (2006). In addition to her scholarly work, she has authored a series of award- winning children’s books with Charlesbridge Publishing: The Farewell Symphony (2000), Pictures at an Exhibition (2003), The Heroic Symphony (2004), Bach’s Goldberg Variations (2005), and Gershwin’s Rhapsody in Blue (2006). Her next children’s book, Duke Ellington’s Nutcracker Suite, will be released in October 2011.

Back to top »

 

 

ANNA DALOS

The Generation of Composers Born in the 30s and the Turn to New Music (1957–1967)

 

Hungarian musicologists traditionally shared the view that it was easier for the composer- generation born in the 30s to break with Bartókian-Kodályian models than for older composers in the 60s. When scrutinizing the repertoire written by the young composers between 1957 and 1967, it became clear that different phases of the break with the national tradition can be distinguished: starting with the reevaluation of Bartók, Hungarian composers turned themselves towards Stravinsky’s and Prokofiev’s neo- classicism and to the compositional technique of Bach and Beethoven. Young composers however avoided serialism, and after some years created a special Hungarian post- serial style from 1964 on. The most characteristic compositions of this early phase – the works of Sándor Balassa (1935), Attila Bozay (1939–1999), Miklós Kocsár (1933), István Láng (1933) and József Soproni (1930) – show what kind of compositional problems stood at the centre of the composer’s interest: the possibilities of working with aleatory and unfixed musical processes, the creation of a melismatic melodic style and the producing of representative forms from the linking of short movements.

 

Anna Dalos (Budapest, 1973) studied musicology at the Franz Liszt Academy of Music, Budapest, from 1993 to 1998; between 1998 and 2002 she attended the Doctoral Program in Musicology of the same institution. She spent a year on a German exchange (DAAD) scholarship at the Humboldt University, Berlin (1999–2000). She is currently working at the Musicological Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. She is a lecturer on the DLA Program of the Franz Liszt Academy of Music since 2007, and visiting lecturer at the International Zoltán Kodály Pedagogical Institute of Music, Kecskemét since 2010. Her research is focused on 20th century Hungarian music, the history of composition and musicology in Hungary. She has had journal articles published on these subjects, as well as short monographs on several Hungarian composers (Pál, Kadosa, György Kósa, Rudolf Maros). Her book on Zoltán Kodály’s poetics was published in 2007 in Budapest.

Back to top »

 

 

ANNA SCHOLZ

Articulation in Bach’s Six Suites for Solo Cello, Part 1
Problems of the Sources and the Critical Editions

 

In 2000 four critical, urtext editions of the Bach Cello Suites were published: Egon Voss/Henle, Kirsten Beisswenger/Breitkopf, Ulrich Leisinger/Wiener Urtext, and Bettina Schwemer- Douglas Woodfull- Harris/Bärenreiter. Comparing them to each other and to the volumes of the Neue Bach Ausgabe (Hans Eppstein, 1988/91) it is very easy to discover the numerous and significant differences in the articulation marks. What causes the differences? And how is it possible to make a well- informed decision between the editions?
No autograph manuscript of the compositions survives, and the editors differ in their judgement of the importance of the four extant copies (by Anna Magdalena Bach, Johann Peter Kellner and by two anonymous copyists from the second half of the 18th century). This results in differing editorial principles: Voss and Beisswenger base their edition on AMB’s copy, Leisinger on the two later manuscripts, while Eppstein prepares two texts: one based on the two earlier, the other on the later copies. But even the editions prepared based on mainly similar principles are not nearly identical: this is explained by the often very ambiguous articulation marks of the sources.
The editors for Bärenreiter give a radically different answer to the questions raised by the extant sources of the pieces: they decided to omit articulation marks entirely from their edition; users and performers are thus called upon to create their own version by studying the attached facsimiles.
By examining a number of examples from the editions and the sources in detail, the article shows several types of problems encountered in the manuscripts and evaluates the answers given by the editors.
The article is a summary of Anna Scholz’s DLA dissertation (Budapest, 2008).

 

Anna Scholz studied cello at the Oberlin Conservatory (USA), and in the class of Tamás Koó at the Franz Liszt Academy (Budapest). In the latter institution, she studied musicology as well, and received a DLA degree in cello in 2008. Since 2003 she has been a member of the Hungarian State Opera Orchestra. She pursues a strong interest in historical performance: she started playing baroque cello with Catharina Meints at the Oberlin Conservatory and in 2006 she continued these studies with Herwig Tachezi in Vienna. Since 2003 she has been an active member of the Orfeo Orchestra, an ensemble that plays period instruments. She is the author of numerous CD- booklets for Hungaroton Label’s „First Recording” series.

 

Back to top »